Malaga, I do actually feel guilty about all the money his mum spends on him travelling. I know their family dynamics are very different, he's an only child and his mum earns relatively well for Polish standards, but I've been brought up with a different mindset and I can't just get rid of that (nor do I want).
I would never ever take money to visit my LDR boyfriend from my mum. I was 17 when I had my first boyfriend and he happened to live 100km away, so I got a job and earned the money for the bi-weekly trainrides myself.
I had to take money from my mum for a few months last year, because if I had worked I would have earned too much and it would have ended up costing her more (complicated story) and I felt guilty for every cent I didn't spend on absolute necesseties like food and copies. And she only gave me €50 a month, most of my expenses I still covered with governmental financial support.
I don't know about anyone else, but €250 a month is a lot of money for me.
There's no way my mum could provide me with that much in her current situation. She'd have to get a 1-bedroom place with her husband and give up on holidays alltogether. 250€ a month (scholarship + the same amount in loans) makes all the difference between getting higher education or not for me. And keep in mind he'd be getting closer to €500 each month. That IS a lot of money.
If hes going to be fully on his parents support, they'll have to give him €500-600 a month, which is more than the median income in Poland.
I'm not responsible for him or his family... not as long as we're not married anyway. But the way I see it, we're in this together. We're not married yet, but I'm very committed and I'm willing to take on the good and the bad things that come with this relatioship. If I had enough money, so that getting married meant I would have to provide for him, then I'd do that. I'm counting on him doing the same once we finish our degrees and he's going to get a cool high paid job with his engineering degree while I'll be stuck in ridiculously low paid temporal positions, because I chose to study liberal arts....
Like I said before, we're not going to rush into anything and even if we decided to do it, we wouldn't go to the registry office like tomorrow. As of now, it's an option we're considering if it makes our lives a lot easier. If the situations was reversed and getting married meant I would a) my parents won't have to support me anymore and b) instead of working fast food or some other crap job I could fully concentrate on my studies, I wouldn't have to think about it very long.
*edit:
I don't know if it's important in the grande scheme of things, but it might be interesting:
When I first started researching this I thought things were different and he wouldn't be eligible for the financial aid at all.
But you're only allowed to make a certain amount of money each month, if you make more it gets taken off your aid (which is fair and logical). I'm getting a raise as of next semester because I'll have a Bachelor's degree and I'm employed at the university. So I'll be making too much money and have my financial aid cut. In consequence I'll be working for free, because I can't cut my hours either.
However if your spouse has none or very little income, you're allowed to make more because you're supposed to support them.
So initially I thought I had the choice between working for free (=giving money to the state) or sharing my income with my boyfriend. I'm a socialist at heart, but I'm also selfish and I would have preferred to give money to my boyfriend than to the state.
Especially seeing as I fully count on him to support me at a later stage in life.
I have no idea whether that makes more sense and it doesn't really matter since it's irrelevant in or situation. If he's eligible for financial aid himself, he can't affect mine.
Maybe it offers an explanation of why I've considered getting married for financial reasons in the first place.
I would never ever take money to visit my LDR boyfriend from my mum. I was 17 when I had my first boyfriend and he happened to live 100km away, so I got a job and earned the money for the bi-weekly trainrides myself.
I had to take money from my mum for a few months last year, because if I had worked I would have earned too much and it would have ended up costing her more (complicated story) and I felt guilty for every cent I didn't spend on absolute necesseties like food and copies. And she only gave me €50 a month, most of my expenses I still covered with governmental financial support.
I don't know about anyone else, but €250 a month is a lot of money for me.
There's no way my mum could provide me with that much in her current situation. She'd have to get a 1-bedroom place with her husband and give up on holidays alltogether. 250€ a month (scholarship + the same amount in loans) makes all the difference between getting higher education or not for me. And keep in mind he'd be getting closer to €500 each month. That IS a lot of money.
If hes going to be fully on his parents support, they'll have to give him €500-600 a month, which is more than the median income in Poland.
I'm not responsible for him or his family... not as long as we're not married anyway. But the way I see it, we're in this together. We're not married yet, but I'm very committed and I'm willing to take on the good and the bad things that come with this relatioship. If I had enough money, so that getting married meant I would have to provide for him, then I'd do that. I'm counting on him doing the same once we finish our degrees and he's going to get a cool high paid job with his engineering degree while I'll be stuck in ridiculously low paid temporal positions, because I chose to study liberal arts....
Like I said before, we're not going to rush into anything and even if we decided to do it, we wouldn't go to the registry office like tomorrow. As of now, it's an option we're considering if it makes our lives a lot easier. If the situations was reversed and getting married meant I would a) my parents won't have to support me anymore and b) instead of working fast food or some other crap job I could fully concentrate on my studies, I wouldn't have to think about it very long.
*edit:
I don't know if it's important in the grande scheme of things, but it might be interesting:
When I first started researching this I thought things were different and he wouldn't be eligible for the financial aid at all.
But you're only allowed to make a certain amount of money each month, if you make more it gets taken off your aid (which is fair and logical). I'm getting a raise as of next semester because I'll have a Bachelor's degree and I'm employed at the university. So I'll be making too much money and have my financial aid cut. In consequence I'll be working for free, because I can't cut my hours either.
However if your spouse has none or very little income, you're allowed to make more because you're supposed to support them.
So initially I thought I had the choice between working for free (=giving money to the state) or sharing my income with my boyfriend. I'm a socialist at heart, but I'm also selfish and I would have preferred to give money to my boyfriend than to the state.
Especially seeing as I fully count on him to support me at a later stage in life.
I have no idea whether that makes more sense and it doesn't really matter since it's irrelevant in or situation. If he's eligible for financial aid himself, he can't affect mine.
Maybe it offers an explanation of why I've considered getting married for financial reasons in the first place.
Comment