So, I've been seeing this amazing woman since August (we've known each other for over a year). She lives in the UK and I live in N.Y., USA. I have a 6-year-old daughter from my previous marriage. Here, she sees my family once every month or two, and my ex's family once a month or a bit more. She sees my ex once or twice a week. He's involved, in terms of making his presence known, but has zero responsibility toward her care.
GF and I are not at a point where we'd be making any kind of relocation decisions, but I asked my lawyer what my chances of relocation are, keeping my daughter with me. If I were to offer vacations which would leave ex-husband with more parenting time hours, just clumped into 3 or 4 visits per year, with evening skype "dates." The school district and cultural opportunities and financial situation would improve greatly.
My lawyer said she wouldn't even take that case. It's virtually impossible. If I wanted to move, I would have to assume I'd be moving without my daughter.
My city is not somewhere I would want to bring my GF to live. It's not bad, but it is economically depressed, and the education system is crap, and the job situation is incredibly dismal in her type of career. She has established so much where she lives, and I think both my life and my daughter's would improve immensely by living there. But after hearing this honesty from my lawyer, I almost wonder if it would hurt less to give up hope now and move on.
I'm crying thinking about that. There is no doubt I love her, and she loves me. I am happier than I've ever been, and yes, it's only been 4 months, but still. I imagine my life with her, married, possibly with a second child, and it makes me happy. I'd survive without her, I know that, but I would be pretty miserable and lonely. I can't imagine being with anyone else, so I think I'd pretty much just stick with single mom life.
Has anyone moved, against their ex's wishes, so far away? Especially from N.Y.? I just need to know it's not hopeless. I don't want to have to choose between the woman I love, and my child. My child wins, always, but losing her would break my heart.
Thanks. I know this wasn't very clear, but I'm a bit scatterbrained right now.
GF and I are not at a point where we'd be making any kind of relocation decisions, but I asked my lawyer what my chances of relocation are, keeping my daughter with me. If I were to offer vacations which would leave ex-husband with more parenting time hours, just clumped into 3 or 4 visits per year, with evening skype "dates." The school district and cultural opportunities and financial situation would improve greatly.
My lawyer said she wouldn't even take that case. It's virtually impossible. If I wanted to move, I would have to assume I'd be moving without my daughter.
My city is not somewhere I would want to bring my GF to live. It's not bad, but it is economically depressed, and the education system is crap, and the job situation is incredibly dismal in her type of career. She has established so much where she lives, and I think both my life and my daughter's would improve immensely by living there. But after hearing this honesty from my lawyer, I almost wonder if it would hurt less to give up hope now and move on.
I'm crying thinking about that. There is no doubt I love her, and she loves me. I am happier than I've ever been, and yes, it's only been 4 months, but still. I imagine my life with her, married, possibly with a second child, and it makes me happy. I'd survive without her, I know that, but I would be pretty miserable and lonely. I can't imagine being with anyone else, so I think I'd pretty much just stick with single mom life.
Has anyone moved, against their ex's wishes, so far away? Especially from N.Y.? I just need to know it's not hopeless. I don't want to have to choose between the woman I love, and my child. My child wins, always, but losing her would break my heart.
Thanks. I know this wasn't very clear, but I'm a bit scatterbrained right now.
Comment