Originally posted by louisanna6
View Post
Marriage isn't just about love--it's a legal institution that is damn hard, not to mention expensive, to get yourself out of once in. So, it's well worth it to put some time behind you in a committed relationship before you make a decision to be legally bound to someone. And we're all confident that it's too soon because people who get married after knowing each other for only a few months and stay together for the long haul are the exception and not the rule. It's a sad fact that the incredibly high divorce statistics in almost every developed country back up.
I'm sorry that not everybody is validating your decision, but seriously, read Eclaire's post. We're just trying to see through the rose-colored glasses.















), and plenty of fiance/es of members there have been brought over after the couple only visited a few times and for maybe a week at a time or a weekend here and there when they could afford it. The US government absolutely does not require that you've lived together. Marriage often happens within our own borders without the couple living together first (although this practice is somewhat old-fashioned, it still happens). They want to see you have a bona fide relationship with ample evidence of frequent contact as well as evidence of being together in person in the last 2 years. Of course the more visits the better, and longer visits or even staying for some months look much better, but it doesn't mean that shorter or fewer visits bar someone from being brought over. What the consulate officers care about is the relationship being genuine.

Comment