I mentioned this on another thread and decided to post a topic about it. I realise there was one in May, but I'm reviving it, and with a different opinion.
I feel that sometimes, and I imagine I've done it too, people tend to adopt a bit of an Elitist attitude around being in a LDR, for a myriad of reasons. I've heard everything from that their relationship is stronger than a close-distance relationship because sex isn't such a high priority that other issues get shoved out of the way to that there are deeper levels of trust, honesty, and communication in a LDR than in a CDR. I have also heard the negative inverse of these statements: some people feel people are more likely to cheat in a LDR than a CDR, and some people feel that though there may be greater communication, it's more of a friendship than a relationship.
I feel I personally fall somewhere in the middle.
I tend to believe that a lot of people in LDR learn to communicate sooner than a lot of people in CDRs, simply because they have to. But that doesn't eliminate communication issues from arising at all in LDRs, and many are the same as in CDRs! Sure, there may be some things that are unique to a LDR, such as needing to figure out times to communicate with one another simply because that's what your relationship is based on, but the insecurity around other women is not going to magically disappear once you become close-distance. If you have a reoccuring argument over the same damn thing, it's not going to be resolved the instant you become long-distance. If you are both guilting one another or you take out your anger/stress on the other, that won't go away either. These are all issues that can be solved with communication, but not by the amount of distance there is between you. You may feel less insecure when you're able to spend time with your boyfriend's female friends when you're there, but this is masking an insecurity, not eliminating it, and that was my point in the other thread. I think communication tends to be better in LDRs because it's required given the circumstances, whereas it may take some time to figure it out in CDRs (not in all cases) because it's easier to mask. But the way I see it is like learning something, sometimes you simply have to do, and get your hands dirty, before you can learn.
I feel the same way as I do above with trust and honesty. I feel like a LDR is really being tossed out of a helicopter into the middle of a great body of water. You can choose to sink, or you can choose to swim, and I think most anyone, given our fight or flight response, would choose to swim. In a LDR, yes, trust is still earned and not easily handed over, but I think people in CDRs have the benefit of more time to build that trust. For me, at least, trust has been required in both my LDRs near from the beginning, simply based on the circumstances, and honesty has been too. But isn't honesty something that should be present in a close-distance relationship? It isn't always, no, but it's not always present in a LDR, either. I don't see honesty as being something that's relationship specific at all, and I don't think it's required any less in a CDR than a LDR, frankly. If my partner all of a sudden stopped being more honest with me because we became CD, I'd be sorely upset. And when it comes to cheating, I don't think people in a LDR are any more or less likely to cheat than someone in a CDR, because I think cheating is not necessarily about the relationship or the partner but rather it says a lot about the cheater, and I think that someone who cheats LD has just as much capacity to cheat CD.
And again, when it comes to sex. I disagree that LDRs are stronger because sex is less of a priority. I think a good number of people have expressed being horny as hell when going to see their partners. :P And there's nothing wrong with that. True enough, it's impossible to have a substantial friends with benefits situation in a LDR, so you avoid that, but in my opinion, people wanting a relationship that's solely sexual aren't the type of people who would enter into a LDR to begin with. Personally, I don't see sex as separate to getting to know, love, and understand my partner but rather as an extension of it. And given what many people have said here, such as on the "First Time Touching Your Partner's Equipment" thread, I can assume that many of you would agree that that is what your sexual experiences, at least your first ones (with each other), have been like. I don't see this as being any different to being in a CDR. For example, my morals don't all of a sudden change in a LDR from a CDR. :P I don't all of a sudden become less likely to want sex. I simply don't see it as so much of a priority that I need it/the physical affection before I need anything else, but this would be true in a close-distance relationship as well, and my timelines for sex in a LDR and CDR would be about the same and have the same "standards."
I will agree that LDRs are particularly hard in one area: closing the distance. Because a) there's the fact that one partner has to completely uproot themselves, not from a house, an apartment, or college dorm room, but from a new state/country and b) there's the fact that you do have to learn how to be close-distance with one another, whereas people who have had CDRs already have that benefit; if you were CD once before, then you have to re-learn it, and I think these things are unique to being in a LDR. But being in a CDR has its perks and own sets of issues as well. Do I believe that LDRs are harder because you don't get to see your partner as often (this is the second "particularly hard" area/issue)? Damn straight I do. I think that separation is an immense test that yes, I will admit you don't have to face in a CDR (though I'm not sure it's always necessary, and I don't feel it's any more proving of one's love), but the way I feel about it is that whether you're long-distance or close-distance, it doesn't change who you are fundamentally. The issues you have in a LDR, you'd be facing in a CDR as well, and vice versa, and they'd both present you with their own unique set of, as I said, perks and issues. This is coming from someone who's in a LDR, but I don't feel it's fair to say that LDRs are stronger than CDRs based on circumstances you didn't choose, because if you were CD, I think your timeline would easily follow that of your friends' relationship timelines as far as the learning process. :P I don't think learning lessons sooner makes the relationship any stronger, simply because I think if fundamentally, you're the sort of person who can work on the issues in your relationship and really work and compromise to make it work and to maintain a stable, healthy relationship, then you're going to be that way CD as well.
I understand that others will likely share different opinions, so what do you think and why?
I feel that sometimes, and I imagine I've done it too, people tend to adopt a bit of an Elitist attitude around being in a LDR, for a myriad of reasons. I've heard everything from that their relationship is stronger than a close-distance relationship because sex isn't such a high priority that other issues get shoved out of the way to that there are deeper levels of trust, honesty, and communication in a LDR than in a CDR. I have also heard the negative inverse of these statements: some people feel people are more likely to cheat in a LDR than a CDR, and some people feel that though there may be greater communication, it's more of a friendship than a relationship.
I feel I personally fall somewhere in the middle.
I tend to believe that a lot of people in LDR learn to communicate sooner than a lot of people in CDRs, simply because they have to. But that doesn't eliminate communication issues from arising at all in LDRs, and many are the same as in CDRs! Sure, there may be some things that are unique to a LDR, such as needing to figure out times to communicate with one another simply because that's what your relationship is based on, but the insecurity around other women is not going to magically disappear once you become close-distance. If you have a reoccuring argument over the same damn thing, it's not going to be resolved the instant you become long-distance. If you are both guilting one another or you take out your anger/stress on the other, that won't go away either. These are all issues that can be solved with communication, but not by the amount of distance there is between you. You may feel less insecure when you're able to spend time with your boyfriend's female friends when you're there, but this is masking an insecurity, not eliminating it, and that was my point in the other thread. I think communication tends to be better in LDRs because it's required given the circumstances, whereas it may take some time to figure it out in CDRs (not in all cases) because it's easier to mask. But the way I see it is like learning something, sometimes you simply have to do, and get your hands dirty, before you can learn.
I feel the same way as I do above with trust and honesty. I feel like a LDR is really being tossed out of a helicopter into the middle of a great body of water. You can choose to sink, or you can choose to swim, and I think most anyone, given our fight or flight response, would choose to swim. In a LDR, yes, trust is still earned and not easily handed over, but I think people in CDRs have the benefit of more time to build that trust. For me, at least, trust has been required in both my LDRs near from the beginning, simply based on the circumstances, and honesty has been too. But isn't honesty something that should be present in a close-distance relationship? It isn't always, no, but it's not always present in a LDR, either. I don't see honesty as being something that's relationship specific at all, and I don't think it's required any less in a CDR than a LDR, frankly. If my partner all of a sudden stopped being more honest with me because we became CD, I'd be sorely upset. And when it comes to cheating, I don't think people in a LDR are any more or less likely to cheat than someone in a CDR, because I think cheating is not necessarily about the relationship or the partner but rather it says a lot about the cheater, and I think that someone who cheats LD has just as much capacity to cheat CD.
And again, when it comes to sex. I disagree that LDRs are stronger because sex is less of a priority. I think a good number of people have expressed being horny as hell when going to see their partners. :P And there's nothing wrong with that. True enough, it's impossible to have a substantial friends with benefits situation in a LDR, so you avoid that, but in my opinion, people wanting a relationship that's solely sexual aren't the type of people who would enter into a LDR to begin with. Personally, I don't see sex as separate to getting to know, love, and understand my partner but rather as an extension of it. And given what many people have said here, such as on the "First Time Touching Your Partner's Equipment" thread, I can assume that many of you would agree that that is what your sexual experiences, at least your first ones (with each other), have been like. I don't see this as being any different to being in a CDR. For example, my morals don't all of a sudden change in a LDR from a CDR. :P I don't all of a sudden become less likely to want sex. I simply don't see it as so much of a priority that I need it/the physical affection before I need anything else, but this would be true in a close-distance relationship as well, and my timelines for sex in a LDR and CDR would be about the same and have the same "standards."
I will agree that LDRs are particularly hard in one area: closing the distance. Because a) there's the fact that one partner has to completely uproot themselves, not from a house, an apartment, or college dorm room, but from a new state/country and b) there's the fact that you do have to learn how to be close-distance with one another, whereas people who have had CDRs already have that benefit; if you were CD once before, then you have to re-learn it, and I think these things are unique to being in a LDR. But being in a CDR has its perks and own sets of issues as well. Do I believe that LDRs are harder because you don't get to see your partner as often (this is the second "particularly hard" area/issue)? Damn straight I do. I think that separation is an immense test that yes, I will admit you don't have to face in a CDR (though I'm not sure it's always necessary, and I don't feel it's any more proving of one's love), but the way I feel about it is that whether you're long-distance or close-distance, it doesn't change who you are fundamentally. The issues you have in a LDR, you'd be facing in a CDR as well, and vice versa, and they'd both present you with their own unique set of, as I said, perks and issues. This is coming from someone who's in a LDR, but I don't feel it's fair to say that LDRs are stronger than CDRs based on circumstances you didn't choose, because if you were CD, I think your timeline would easily follow that of your friends' relationship timelines as far as the learning process. :P I don't think learning lessons sooner makes the relationship any stronger, simply because I think if fundamentally, you're the sort of person who can work on the issues in your relationship and really work and compromise to make it work and to maintain a stable, healthy relationship, then you're going to be that way CD as well.
I understand that others will likely share different opinions, so what do you think and why?
Comment