Originally posted by kittyo9
View Post
I would define a relationship as an exclusive arrangement between two people, where both parties are committed to a long term partnership. I don't think that "dating," where one or both parties may be engaging other parties romantically should be counted.
While it is not statistical by any means, I have noticed two dominant trends in this thread. These categories may seem intuitive, but I thought the input from members helped shed some additional light on what I had already noticed. These are obliviously not totally inclusive, but dominant:
1) Most relationships are at a distance. People who fall into this category may or may not meet their partners online. However, one one or more of their relationships generally began at a distance, and there may be a considerable period of time before they meet in person. People in this category may consider themselves shy or introverted and generally take the relationship at a somewhat slower place than relationships that begin with close proximity (CD). In many instances, the people who consistently engage in long distance relationships also seem to be engaging particular groups or demographics that may not be a easy to engage in their immediate community; these can very by race/ethnicity, activity, etc.
2) Most relationships are not at a distance. People who fall into this category are likely to have had two or less long distance relationships. Many of the people in this category may have met their partner at close proximity (CD) and the relationship eventually became long distance. Many of these people do not appear to have difficulty meeting ideal partners within their general proximity and are generally unwilling to engage in another long distance relationship should their present long distance relationship not be fruitful.
Just things that I noticed thus far... BTW: Thank you for everyone who decided to comment in this thread...it was definitely interesting. Also, thanks to anyone who voted even if you didn't comment.
Comment